Speaker Johnson sends House home early, sidestepping vote to impeach Hegseth over Iran war
House Republican leaders canceled Thursday's session and sent members home for a seven-week recess, using a scheduling maneuver to avoid a forced vote on Rep. Thomas Massie's resolution accusing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of illegally waging war in Iran, Yemen and Venezuela.

The House will leave Washington a day early and stay away for seven weeks, a scheduling change Speaker Mike Johnson announced Wednesday that has the practical effect of shelving a vote on impeaching Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over his conduct of last winter's war with Iran.
Republican leaders had planned to keep the House in session through Thursday. Instead, members will take a final vote Wednesday evening on a bipartisan Russia and Iran sanctions bill, then depart for a recess that will keep them out of the Capitol until after the November midterms. The change matters because Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, filed a privileged resolution Tuesday to impeach Hegseth, which under House rules would have forced a floor vote within two legislative days — that is, on Thursday. By canceling that day, Johnson avoids putting members on record.
Asked directly whether the early departure was designed to spare Republicans a difficult vote, Johnson said it was not. But he was unsparing about Massie's effort. "It is a publicity stunt by someone who wants attention," Johnson told reporters, adding that the resolution "will immediately be tabled, of course" and "we probably won't do that today, we will do it when we come back." He also said lawmakers "should not be playing games with national security."
The numbers behind the charges
Massie's 34-page resolution, filed with the House Judiciary Committee, lays out eight articles of impeachment. Three accuse Hegseth of violating specific sections of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 by ordering strikes on Iran on February 28, 2026, without a declaration of war, and by keeping forces engaged after the law's 60- and 90-day withdrawal deadlines passed and after both chambers of Congress voted in June to direct their removal through House Concurrent Resolution 86 — the first time in the resolution's history that both chambers had agreed on such a directive.
The remaining five articles reach beyond the Iran campaign itself:
- Article IV cites a February 28 strike that hit an elementary school in Iran's Hormozgan province, which the resolution says killed or wounded more than 200 people, most of them girls between seven and twelve years old, after Hegseth had sought to roll back congressionally mandated civilian-protection programs.
- Article V says a campaign of strikes on suspected drug-smuggling vessels in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific killed at least 221 people across 63 attacks without any judicial process, including two survivors clinging to wreckage who were killed in a follow-up strike roughly 45 minutes after the initial hit.
- Article VI accuses Hegseth of retaliating against Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., a retired Navy captain, after Kelly told service members in a video they could refuse illegal orders; the Pentagon publicly floated recalling Kelly to active duty for court-martial and later issued him a formal letter of censure.
- Article VII covers the January raid that captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which the resolution says killed at least 83 people and caused seven American casualties, and which it alleges was really aimed at securing Venezuelan oil.
- Article VIII cites Operation Rough Rider, a roughly 1,100-strike bombing campaign in Yemen that the resolution links to about 224 civilian deaths over 52 days, launched, it says, even after senior officials including Vice President JD Vance argued in a group chat that there was no urgency to act.
How a war reshaped the House calendar
The impeachment push is the latest turn in a fight over war powers that has run through nearly all of the past year. The Iran conflict began in February when the United States, alongside Israel, struck Iranian military and nuclear sites; President Trump has since declared a ceasefire in place. Congress has voted more than a dozen times on measures to limit or end American involvement, and in June, H.Con.Res. 86 became the only war-powers resolution of its kind ever to clear both the House and the Senate. The administration has continued military operations regardless, including the strikes and the Venezuela operation cited in Massie's articles.
Massie, a libertarian-leaning Republican who lost his primary this year and is retiring from Congress in January, has been one of the loudest GOP voices against the Iran and Venezuela operations. He read the articles aloud on the House floor for more than an hour Tuesday, saying he deliberately kept the resolution's existence quiet until then to prevent leadership from rearranging the schedule beforehand — a maneuver Johnson's cancellation of Thursday's session effectively outflanked anyway.
Who is caught in the middle
The immediate effect falls on House Republicans in competitive districts, who would have faced a binary choice on the floor: vote to table a resolution accusing the administration of war crimes, or vote on the substance of impeaching a sitting Cabinet secretary seven weeks before an election. Democrats, who control none of the levers of this privileged-motion fight, watched a GOP-only spectacle play out; Massie's own party controls whether and when the vote happens.
Hegseth and the Pentagon are also directly implicated, since the resolution targets not just the Iran war but his broader record on civilian-casualty policy, the removal of the armed services' senior military lawyers, and the confrontation with Kelly. The Defense Department has pushed back forcefully. Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson called Hegseth a "transformative leader" who has "slashed bureaucracy, unleashed innovation, and delivered for our warfighters."
"Secretary Hegseth is doing a phenomenal job, and the secretary of war doesn't just go off and do things. So, he follows the law. And so the DOJ plays a role in that, and we play an active role in making sure the laws are complied with," Attorney General Todd Blanche told reporters Tuesday.
Kelly, for his part, has separately filed suit against Hegseth over the censure and threatened recall to active duty, arguing the retaliation violated his First Amendment rights and the constitutional protections afforded to sitting lawmakers.
What happens next
Because Massie's motion is privileged, it does not disappear when the House adjourns — it will still be pending when members return, and Massie can seek to force a vote again after the election. Johnson has signaled Republican leadership intends to move to table it whenever that vote occurs, a procedural step that would kill the measure without a substantive vote on the charges themselves. Even if the resolution somehow avoided being tabled, conviction and removal would still require two-thirds of the Senate, a threshold no impeachment of a sitting Cabinet official has ever cleared.
The House's own roll call record shows just how close that June vote was — 215 to 208 — on the same directive to remove troops from Iran that Massie's resolution says the administration simply ignored. Wednesday's sanctions vote is the last item of business before the chamber goes dark for its pre-election recess. Lawmakers are due back in Washington after November 3, by which point the political stakes of an impeachment vote — for both parties — will look considerably different than they did this week.
CBS News — GOP Rep. Thomas Massie introduces impeachment articles against Hegseth over Iran war
NPR — Republican Rep. Massie moves to impeach Defense Secretary Hegseth over Iran war
CNN — Speaker Johnson sending House home early, staving off Hegseth impeachment vote over Iran war
PBS NewsHour — Rep. Massie introduces articles of impeachment against Hegseth on House floor

Trump's Third Surgeon General Pick Faces Senate Panel After Two Nominations Collapsed

FBI director Kash Patel faces hostile Senate hearing over hiring rules, journalist inquiries

Federal judge blocks new visa time limits for international students hours before they were set to begin
