US Edition
Your source for latest news
TechnologyConsumer Tech

Apple's first touchscreen MacBook Pro ships to a lukewarm verdict on touch

The $2,899-and-up MacBook Pro brings Apple's first touchscreen to the Mac, but reviewers at multiple outlets agree on little except that the feature justifying the launch adds less than the OLED display underneath it.

PT
By PressTemps Technology DeskPublished Today, 13:24 ET · 5 min read
Apple's first touchscreen MacBook Pro ships to a lukewarm verdict on touch
Apple Park, the company's Cupertino, California headquarters. Photo: Daniel L. Lu / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).
What to know
Apple's MacBook Pro with PROLED XDR Display began shipping November 6, the first touchscreen Mac in company history.
Pricing starts at $2,899, about $400 more than the equivalent mini-LED configuration without OLED or touch, which Apple still sells.
Reviewers at Engadget, 9to5Mac and MacRumors independently praised the OLED display but called touch input a minor addition rather than a reason to buy.
The reaction echoes Steve Jobs's 2010 argument that vertical touchscreens cause arm fatigue, an idea with some support in human-factors research.

Apple's first touchscreen laptop shipped to customers on Friday, ending nearly two decades of the company insisting that fingers did not belong on a Mac screen. By Saturday, the verdict from reviewers and early buyers had hardened into something unusually consistent across outlets that rarely agree: the new display is exceptional, and the touch feature the whole launch was built around is largely beside the point.

The MacBook Pro with PROLED XDR Display, as Apple calls it, went on sale in 30 countries on November 6 after pre-orders opened October 28. It comes in 14-inch and 16-inch sizes, starts at $2,899, and uses a tandem-OLED panel Apple says reaches 2,000 nits of peak brightness with a 10,000,000-to-1 contrast ratio. It is also, for the first time on any Mac, a touchscreen.

What $2,899 buys

The 14-inch model with an M5 Pro chip starts at $2,899; the 16-inch version with the same chip starts at $3,399. Stepping up to an M5 Max chip pushes the price to $4,499 and $4,799. That is roughly $400 more, model for model, than the mini-LED MacBook Pro configurations Apple continues to sell alongside the new OLED version — the actual premium for the display and touch input, as several reviewers pointed out — and closer to $900 more than Apple's cheapest 14-inch MacBook Pro, a non-touch M6 model with no OLED option.

Specs otherwise carry over from the existing lineup: up to 128GB of unified memory, up to 16TB of storage, three Thunderbolt 5 ports, Wi-Fi 7, and a claimed 24 hours of battery life. The new machines are also thinner and lighter than their mini-LED predecessors — the 14-inch drops to roughly three pounds — and bring a Dynamic Island to macOS in place of the camera notch. Johny Srouji, Apple's chief hardware officer, called the laptop "a monumental step forward for the Mac" in the announcement.

The screen wins, the touch shrugs

Review embargoes lifted November 5, a day before the machines reached buyers, and the pattern across outlets was striking for how little they disagreed. Engadget, which scored the 16-inch model 8.8 out of 10, called the OLED panel among the brightest ever put in a laptop but wrote that "the least interesting thing about Apple's new touchscreen MacBook Pro is the touchscreen," noting that touch interactions mostly register as if they were mouse clicks rather than unlocking any new way of working. MacRumors described touch as "a bonus rather than a reason to buy," and found the display still wobbles slightly when tapped despite a stiffened hinge.

9to5Mac's review went further, arguing that Apple's own trackpad is good enough that touch adds little for most Mac workflows, and that the feature is really aimed at niche cases like testing iPhone apps in Xcode's simulator or using iPhone Mirroring.

"The ergonomics of using a touchscreen as the primary input method on a laptop-style device are, in fact, terrible," 9to5Mac's Chance Miller wrote, adding that Apple had clearly designed touch as "a secondary input method" rather than a replacement for the keyboard and trackpad.

YouTube reviewer Marques Brownlee, who has one of the largest followings in consumer tech, was blunter in a hands-on video widely cited by other outlets the same week, calling the touch experience "sloppy and messy" and arguing Apple was "adapting for you, but they're not solving anything." He said he would buy the new model for its lighter weight and screen alone, touchscreen or not.

Why Apple said no for so long

The reaction revives an argument Steve Jobs made explicitly in 2010, when he dismissed touchscreen PCs by arguing that touch input on an upright screen tires the arm in a way that a flat tablet or phone does not — the effect since nicknamed "gorilla arm." That intuition has some grounding in human-factors research. A study presented at the INTERACT 2015 conference, published by Springer, measured muscle activity in people using a large multi-touch display for an hour in both vertical and horizontal orientations and found that the vertical setup produced measurable, objective fatigue in the shoulder and forearm that the horizontal one did not, even though users reported feeling tired either way. The display in that study was a wall-mounted touch panel rather than a laptop, so it does not settle the question for a 14-inch screen propped at a desk — but it is the kind of evidence Apple's own engineers would have had to design around.

Windows laptop makers have sold touchscreen machines for well over a decade without displacing the keyboard-and-trackpad model for serious work, which is part of why Apple's arrival in the category now reads to much of the press less as an innovation than as a catch-up move dressed in a new display technology.

Who it is actually for

Apple is pitching the machine primarily at creative professionals — video editors, photographers and designers who benefit from the OLED panel's color accuracy and from touch gestures in apps like Xcode, and whose work the company ties to its Creator Studio subscription service. Notably, the new MacBook Pro does not support the Apple Pencil, which blunts the obvious comparison to the iPad Pro and leaves touch limited to taps, swipes and pinch-to-zoom rather than drawing or precision input.

For now, the people most affected are the buyers who have already paid the premium: Apple does not disclose first-weekend sales figures, and neither the company nor independent analysts had published unit estimates as of Saturday. The more consequential test is likely to be the holiday shopping season, when the OLED touch model will compete directly against Apple's own cheaper mini-LED MacBook Pro — a machine with identical chips and nearly identical performance for several hundred dollars less, a comparison several reviewers suggested will be Apple's hardest sell.

  • 14-inch MacBook Pro, M5 Pro, PROLED XDR touch display: $2,899
  • 16-inch MacBook Pro, M5 Pro, PROLED XDR touch display: $3,399
  • 14-inch MacBook Pro, M5 Max, PROLED XDR touch display: $4,499
  • 16-inch MacBook Pro, M5 Max, PROLED XDR touch display: $4,799

Apple has not said whether touch will extend to the MacBook Air or to future base-model MacBook Pros, and the company's own product page continues to sell the non-touch mini-LED versions at lower prices, suggesting Apple itself is not yet betting that every Mac buyer wants a finger-friendly screen.

More on this story

All Technology